This post from last week on Canada's Axiom News site caught my attention.  In it, Jennifer Higgs cites the Vermont Employee Ownership Center – and our 2007-09 Top Small Workplaces – in making the case that companies that are employee owned have "disproportionate excellence" relative to their peers that are not.

Higgs' evidence to support this case includes the fact that a third of our winners the last three years thrive with the help of a true culture of ownership, and that, at least in Vermont, employee-owned firms have tended to win more awards.   She also cites employee engagement research compiled by the National Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO) which finds that, as we've shared here, employee-owned firms "tend to grow faster and are more profitable with higher productivity than non-employee-owned companies."

But, while desirable, do these business outcomes equate to "disproportionate" excellence, or success?  One firsthand perspective I can offer might shed some light on this question.

This year I had the opportunity to read and score a batch of our Top Small Company Workplaces applications.  I looked at the following factors for success, as assessed in our extensive application:

• *Business structure & growth
• Employee metrics
• Benefits
• Learning & development
• Workplace culture & people practices
• Impact of people practices
• Employee participation
• Impact of economy & company response
• Fostering community & collaboration
• Goals & sustainability

I put an asterisk (*) next to the first bullet above because this is the area that asks about employee ownership.  It is only one of 10 areas I, and the rest of our reading teams, are looking at.  I personally put as much or more weight into applicants' benefit offerings, employee development strategies, and responses to the essay questions that make up the last six areas listed above as I put into their business structure/growth.

For me and surely for others now reviewing applications, employee ownership by itself is not a guarantee of moving on to the next round (where our judging panel – of a caliber on par with our 2009 roster, TBA – will select the winners that will be featured in the June issue of Inc. Magazine).  Because employee ownership has historically been viewed similarly relative to many other success factors by our final judging panel, you get the majority of our winners over the last three years that are not employee owned.  This includes such excellent organizations as Healthwise (2007 Winner), Lundberg Family Farms (2008), and Anthony Wilder Design/Build (2009).

So in terms of addressing the claim that employee ownership equals "disproportionate excellence," I stick by what I wrote here last month: While employee ownership is not essential for creating a Winning Workplace, it is often tied to the ability to do so.

How much weight do YOU give employee ownership, as compared with other factors, to achieving excellence (defined as long-term success and sustainability)?